NOVO ARTIGO

RECUSA DA OTAN E UE NO ESTREITO DE HORMUZ 2026

Imagem
  imagem gerada por IA / Trump e estreito de Hormuz Recusa da OTAN e UE no Estreito de Hormuz 2026: Erro de Chamberlain, Ameaça de Mísseis Iranianos e o Fim da Proteção Americana na Europa A guerra entre EUA-Israel e Irã, deflagrada em 28 de fevereiro de 2026, não é apenas mais um conflito no Oriente Médio. É o momento em que a Europa decidiu, mais uma vez, ficar de fora — e isso pode custar muito caro. "Não é nossa guerra" Enquanto mísseis balísticos iranianos caem diariamente sobre Israel, Arábia Saudita, Emirados e bases americanas, a OTAN e a União Europeia responderam com um sonoro “não é nossa guerra”. Trump pediu uma coalizão naval para reabrir o Estreito de Hormuz — rota que responde por 20% do petróleo e gás mundial. A resposta europeia? Silêncio ou desculpas diplomáticas. Alemanha, França e a própria chefe de política externa da UE foram claros: “Não vamos colocar nossos soldados em risco”. Essa postura lembra dolorosamente Neville Chamberlain em 1938. Acreditan...

WHO IS THE CHARTERER?



https://mynorthwest.com/1461525/petrobras-to-supply-fuel-to-iranian-ships-brazil-top-court/

Brazilian supreme court on award, imposed an obligation to the giant state oil Petrobras to supply fuel oil to Iranians vessels lying at anchorage. Therefore, at this odd import and export negotiations, something still must be brought to light. for instance: Who is the Charterer? Assuming that, Brazilian importers bought urea from the Iranians vendors and in turn, will export corn in bulk to Iran.


Bearing in mind that  majors stakeholders and players in foreign trade are fully aware that Iran sanctions are enforce since the beginning of American´s hostages crises in 1979. Embracing a little bit relief in Obama´s government and again facing hard sanctions applied by Trump´s administration against the Iranian government.


I do not know the terms of contract, but suppose that buyers in Brazil decided to buy on FOB " free on board" terms, the responsibilities to arrange sea transport and delivery the cargo at destination port shall be held on sellers/owners account. Bunkers (fuel oil) in this case also should be at vessels Owners account.


However, should the Brazilian buyers and exporters, which seems to be the same claimants in court. Agreed to contract/fixture the sea transportation and sign in time charter, an Iranian flag vessel, the spot risks should be deeper calculated in order to avoid furthers setbacks


Claimants argued that the goods (corn in bulk) are not in sanctions list, really don´t. Nonetheless, the vessels flying the Iranian flag is target in US list according to OFAC (Office foreign assets Control) and penalties in breach these sanctions are severe.



Hope that Petrobras may be well succeeded and will not experiment any damages in this lawful imbroglio.





edited by 
Paulo Silvano
Lawyer and Maritime Consultancy


Comentários

outras postagens

DEMOCRACIA vs. EFICIÊNCIA

GUERRA, IDEOLOGIA E REALIDADE

DATAS SAGRADAS MOVIMENTAM O MUNDO

IA NO MERCADO FINANCEIRO | Disrupção ou Bolha?

A TRAGÉDIA DE CAIM | Intelectuais, poder e o pecado à porta

CONFLITO IRÃ x EUA-ISRAEL | a luz da escatologia